JHeadstart for JDeveloper 10.1.2

Lucas Jellema
0 0
Read Time:2 Minute, 18 Second

The Oracle JHeadstart team is working hard on their ADF JHeadstart release for JDeveloper 10.1.2, to be released shortly – within a month according to the current plan. This release will have a much smaller JHeadstart runtime library as it will completely rely on the Oracle JDeveloper ADF runtime framework for all data-handling. That means that existing JHeadstart applications cannot be easily upgraded or migrated – unless they have been 100% generated. As a consequence, upgrading to ADF JHeadstart 10.1 and JDeveloper 10.1.2 may be somewhat complex.

However, even if an organization would decide NOT to use ADF, they still may – and probably do – want to use JDeveloper 10.1.2 rather than 9.0.5.2 because of the many (over 1000) bug-fixes. What these organizations need is a JHeadstart release that fits in with JDeveloper 10.1.2 and does not require use of ADF. In other words: a simple upgrade of JHeadstart 9.0.5.1 Design Time and Run Time to JDeveloper 10.1.2.

So far, the JHeadstart team has given no indication that they plan to produce such a release, even though presumably it is not a lot of work. The run time is probably exactly the same and the design time probably only needs some modifications in the interface with the JDeveloper plugin API and the BC4J Design Time API. I have posted a question on the OTN Forum for JHeadstart (see: http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jsp?forum=38&thread=282011&message=&tstart=0&trange=30875924#875924 or below).

I am looking forward to the response from the team and will let you know in this weblog.

Sandra and JHeadstart Team,

I would like to urge you to not only move forward and release an ADF JHeadstart 10.1 release – which is an excellent thing to do – but also release a 10.1.2 compliant release of the non-ADF JHeadstart (currently 9.0.5.1).

To allow organizations that do not want to migrate to ADF just now, but DO want to benefit from the many bugfixes in JDeveloper 10.1.2, it is really very important that such a releases becomes available.

As Oracle puts it: productivity with CHOICE. If your choice right now is to NOT use ADF, I think it is not unreasonable to hope for a JHeadstart release that works with 10.1.2 but does not require a full migration to ADF.

Could you shed your light on this? Can you indicate how big a challenge you feel an upgrade of JHeadstart 9.0.5.1 to JDeveloper 10.1.2 (no ADF) would be? (seems to me that it should be relatively light thing to do).

best regards,

Lucas

About Post Author

Lucas Jellema

Lucas Jellema, active in IT (and with Oracle) since 1994. Oracle ACE Director and Oracle Developer Champion. Solution architect and developer on diverse areas including SQL, JavaScript, Kubernetes & Docker, Machine Learning, Java, SOA and microservices, events in various shapes and forms and many other things. Author of the Oracle Press book Oracle SOA Suite 12c Handbook. Frequent presenter on user groups and community events and conferences such as JavaOne, Oracle Code, CodeOne, NLJUG JFall and Oracle OpenWorld.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
Next Post

I Love Lucene - interesting article on TSS about Jakarta Java Based text-search engine

I found a very interesting article on how to get started – and what to expect – from Lucene, the Jakarta Apache text search engine library written entirely in Java. The article: “I Love Lucene” was written by Dion Almaer. It discusses how TSS used Lucene to build their search […]
%d bloggers like this: