<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The rise of the ViewObject &#8211; or: isn&#8217;t the ViewObject the real Data Control?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/blog/3633/the-rise-of-the-viewobject-or-isnt-the-viewobject-the-real-data-control/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/blog/3633/the-rise-of-the-viewobject-or-isnt-the-viewobject-the-real-data-control</link>
	<description>Weblog for the AMIS Technology corner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:47:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/blog/3633/the-rise-of-the-viewobject-or-isnt-the-viewobject-the-real-data-control/comment-page-1#comment-346598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3633#comment-346598</guid>
		<description>JSR-227 - is that thing still out there? Looks to me that Oracle has failed miserably getting this specification accepted - see also: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=2045
Interestingly enough also BEA voted against this specification. So basically imo there will never be acceptance for 227. Look for http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=3865 for a more viable alternative already receiving YES votes across the board. Since JSR-227 is the corner stone of Oracle&#039;s ADF, and because their effort in getting acceptance for this spec has failed, ADF will always have the smell of being to much a proprietary tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JSR-227 &#8211; is that thing still out there? Looks to me that Oracle has failed miserably getting this specification accepted &#8211; see also: <a href="http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=2045" rel="nofollow">http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=2045</a><br />
Interestingly enough also BEA voted against this specification. So basically imo there will never be acceptance for 227. Look for <a href="http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=3865" rel="nofollow">http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=3865</a> for a more viable alternative already receiving YES votes across the board. Since JSR-227 is the corner stone of Oracle&#8217;s ADF, and because their effort in getting acceptance for this spec has failed, ADF will always have the smell of being to much a proprietary tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Vervecken</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/blog/3633/the-rise-of-the-viewobject-or-isnt-the-viewobject-the-real-data-control/comment-page-1#comment-346358</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Vervecken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3633#comment-346358</guid>
		<description>hi Lucas

Maybe Oracle can make your ideas fit in with JSR-227.

regards
Jan Vervecken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Lucas</p>
<p>Maybe Oracle can make your ideas fit in with JSR-227.</p>
<p>regards<br />
Jan Vervecken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

