<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ADF: The best way to indicate for records in a table the existence of details &#8211; or: the importance of up-to-date SQL knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/2011/10/27/adf-the-best-way-to-indicate-for-records-in-a-table-the-existence-of-details-or-the-importance-of-up-to-date-sql-knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2011/10/27/adf-the-best-way-to-indicate-for-records-in-a-table-the-existence-of-details-or-the-importance-of-up-to-date-sql-knowledge/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=adf-the-best-way-to-indicate-for-records-in-a-table-the-existence-of-details-or-the-importance-of-up-to-date-sql-knowledge</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florin Marcus</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2011/10/27/adf-the-best-way-to-indicate-for-records-in-a-table-the-existence-of-details-or-the-importance-of-up-to-date-sql-knowledge/#comment-6915</link>
		<dc:creator>Florin Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 07:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=13912#comment-6915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As always, good article.
This solution is indeed the fastest. However, some purists may complain that it breaks encapsulation, since any access to EMP table ideally should be &#039;hidden&#039; behind EmpEO and EmpVO . Â Breaking this rule too often might decrease the maintenance level of the application.
Thank you,
Florin
Â ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, good article.<br />
This solution is indeed the fastest. However, some purists may complain that it breaks encapsulation, since any access to EMP table ideally should be &#8216;hidden&#8217; behind EmpEO and EmpVO . Â Breaking this rule too often might decrease the maintenance level of the application.<br />
Thank you,<br />
Florin<br />
Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Jellema</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2011/10/27/adf-the-best-way-to-indicate-for-records-in-a-table-the-existence-of-details-or-the-importance-of-up-to-date-sql-knowledge/#comment-6914</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Jellema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 06:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=13912#comment-6914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Anton, as always, I stand corrected - or at least tweaked. You are right of course. Thanks for this feedback.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lucas&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anton, as always, I stand corrected &#8211; or at least tweaked. You are right of course. Thanks for this feedback.</p>
<p>Lucas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Scheffer</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2011/10/27/adf-the-best-way-to-indicate-for-records-in-a-table-the-existence-of-details-or-the-importance-of-up-to-date-sql-knowledge/#comment-6913</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Scheffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=13912#comment-6913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are worried about millions of details the following will be faster:
, case when exists ( select null from emp e where e.deptno = Department.deptno ) then &#039;Y&#039; else &#039;N&#039; end]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are worried about millions of details the following will be faster:<br />
, case when exists ( select null from emp e where e.deptno = Department.deptno ) then &#8216;Y&#8217; else &#8216;N&#8217; end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
