Comments on: Should you expose a Stored Procedure via XMLType? http://technology.amis.nl/2010/12/23/should-you-expose-a-stored-procedure-via-xmltype/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=should-you-expose-a-stored-procedure-via-xmltype Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Lucas Jellema http://technology.amis.nl/2010/12/23/should-you-expose-a-stored-procedure-via-xmltype/#comment-6433 Lucas Jellema Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:26:35 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=9479#comment-6433 Hi Alex,

Thanks for this clear example. I have one additional question: in the introduction to this article, you write ‘it depends’. Having read your article, I still wonder what it depends on. From your article it would seem that using the Object Type approach would always give me a nicer, clearer structure to work with in the mapper. Is there a downside to this? When would using the XMLType return type (and the anyType in XML) be more appropriate?

kind regards,

Lucas

]]> By: Marco Gralike http://technology.amis.nl/2010/12/23/should-you-expose-a-stored-procedure-via-xmltype/#comment-6432 Marco Gralike Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:21:17 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=9479#comment-6432 Be aware that using XSLT (transformation) and using object types (mapping structure) are two different objectives/methods… The object type structure is in this example the equivalent of what you achieve while using an XML Schema…

]]>