<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OOW 2009: The killer feature of Oracle Database 11gR2 &#8211; Edition Based Redefinition (or database object versioning)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/2009/10/13/oow-2009-the-killer-feature-of-oracle-database-11gr2-edition-based-redefinition-or-database-object-versioning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2009/10/13/oow-2009-the-killer-feature-of-oracle-database-11gr2-edition-based-redefinition-or-database-object-versioning/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=oow-2009-the-killer-feature-of-oracle-database-11gr2-edition-based-redefinition-or-database-object-versioning</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Jellema</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2009/10/13/oow-2009-the-killer-feature-of-oracle-database-11gr2-edition-based-redefinition-or-database-object-versioning/#comment-5960</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Jellema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=6401#comment-5960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi Praveen,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Â &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not sure exactly what you are trying to achieve. Oracle will simply not support EBR in EBS 11i. That is their decision. There is no technical limitation for doing it, they are simply not investing that way.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Â &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lucas&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Praveen,</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p>I am not sure exactly what you are trying to achieve. Oracle will simply not support EBR in EBS 11i. That is their decision. There is no technical limitation for doing it, they are simply not investing that way.</p>
<p>Â </p>
<p>Lucas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praveen</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2009/10/13/oow-2009-the-killer-feature-of-oracle-database-11gr2-edition-based-redefinition-or-database-object-versioning/#comment-5959</link>
		<dc:creator>Praveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=6401#comment-5959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi

Very much impressed with your comments on EBR.Â  Good articale with Demo.Â 
Had question on the use of EBR,Â  as its Database feature, why can&#039;t this be implemented with Release 11i of E-Business suite and why to wait for R12 release to support it?Â  Please correct me if i am worng.Â  Please advise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Very much impressed with your comments on EBR.Â  Good articale with Demo.Â <br />
Had question on the use of EBR,Â  as its Database feature, why can&#8217;t this be implemented with Release 11i of E-Business suite and why to wait for R12 release to support it?Â  Please correct me if i am worng.Â  Please advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VRS</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2009/10/13/oow-2009-the-killer-feature-of-oracle-database-11gr2-edition-based-redefinition-or-database-object-versioning/#comment-5958</link>
		<dc:creator>VRS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=6401#comment-5958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,

Great presentation on EBR. I would greatly appreciate if you could suggest how to redesign the system with AQs to ready it for EBR.

Regards,

VRS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Great presentation on EBR. I would greatly appreciate if you could suggest how to redesign the system with AQs to ready it for EBR.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>VRS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Jellema</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2009/10/13/oow-2009-the-killer-feature-of-oracle-database-11gr2-edition-based-redefinition-or-database-object-versioning/#comment-5957</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Jellema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=6401#comment-5957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Rob,
Good to hear from you again! And thanks for your comment. You are right with the analogy with Designer: the Edition really is very similar to the Configuration in Designer Repository/SCM. Given all the time I spent on that functionality in the past, I find it fairly easy to come to understand the 11gR2 EBR mechanism. Hope to meet you sometime in the near future.

best regards,

Lucas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob,<br />
Good to hear from you again! And thanks for your comment. You are right with the analogy with Designer: the Edition really is very similar to the Configuration in Designer Repository/SCM. Given all the time I spent on that functionality in the past, I find it fairly easy to come to understand the 11gR2 EBR mechanism. Hope to meet you sometime in the near future.</p>
<p>best regards,</p>
<p>Lucas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RGauf</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2009/10/13/oow-2009-the-killer-feature-of-oracle-database-11gr2-edition-based-redefinition-or-database-object-versioning/#comment-5956</link>
		<dc:creator>RGauf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=6401#comment-5956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucas -- thanks for once again trying out and making sense of what at first glance seemed like a questionable feature.  The idea seemed good, but not likely to work (hmm, maybe based on Designer Element Version nightmares?).  The key of course is the cross-edition triggers to impute valid / default values into the out-of-edition rows.  Your clear explanation of how and when to use them is great!   Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucas &#8212; thanks for once again trying out and making sense of what at first glance seemed like a questionable feature.  The idea seemed good, but not likely to work (hmm, maybe based on Designer Element Version nightmares?).  The key of course is the cross-edition triggers to impute valid / default values into the out-of-edition rows.  Your clear explanation of how and when to use them is great!   Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
