Comments on: The rise of the ViewObject – or: isn't the ViewObject the real Data Control? http://technology.amis.nl/2008/10/15/the-rise-of-the-viewobject-or-isnt-the-viewobject-the-real-data-control/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-rise-of-the-viewobject-or-isnt-the-viewobject-the-real-data-control Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:09:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Jan http://technology.amis.nl/2008/10/15/the-rise-of-the-viewobject-or-isnt-the-viewobject-the-real-data-control/#comment-5558 Jan Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:11:34 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3633#comment-5558 JSR-227 – is that thing still out there? Looks to me that Oracle has failed miserably getting this specification accepted – see also: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=2045
Interestingly enough also BEA voted against this specification. So basically imo there will never be acceptance for 227. Look for http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=3865 for a more viable alternative already receiving YES votes across the board. Since JSR-227 is the corner stone of Oracle’s ADF, and because their effort in getting acceptance for this spec has failed, ADF will always have the smell of being to much a proprietary tool.

]]> By: Jan Vervecken http://technology.amis.nl/2008/10/15/the-rise-of-the-viewobject-or-isnt-the-viewobject-the-real-data-control/#comment-5557 Jan Vervecken Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:17:58 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3633#comment-5557 hi Lucas

Maybe Oracle can make your ideas fit in with JSR-227.

regards
Jan Vervecken

]]>