<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agile software development, the principles. Principle 7: Working software is the primary measure of progress.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/2008/07/01/agile-software-development-the-principles-principle-7-working-software-is-the-primary-measure-of-progress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/07/01/agile-software-development-the-principles-principle-7-working-software-is-the-primary-measure-of-progress/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=agile-software-development-the-principles-principle-7-working-software-is-the-primary-measure-of-progress</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbrecht van Amerongen</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/07/01/agile-software-development-the-principles-principle-7-working-software-is-the-primary-measure-of-progress/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbrecht van Amerongen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3283#comment-5374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Matthew:

You can choose whatever you like for units of work. As long as you and your team agree upon the common way to estimate and measured them and use the same method during the whole project.

I now that this is the answer you are asking for so here are some examples (I have no preference).
- If you are used to function points analysis. Use this method see http://www.nesma.nl/english/howfpa.htm
- alternatively you can use your own metrics and use a combined method for estimating (e.g. planning poker http://www.planningpoker.com/detail.html)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matthew:</p>
<p>You can choose whatever you like for units of work. As long as you and your team agree upon the common way to estimate and measured them and use the same method during the whole project.</p>
<p>I now that this is the answer you are asking for so here are some examples (I have no preference).<br />
- If you are used to function points analysis. Use this method see <a href="http://www.nesma.nl/english/howfpa.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nesma.nl/english/howfpa.htm</a><br />
- alternatively you can use your own metrics and use a combined method for estimating (e.g. planning poker <a href="http://www.planningpoker.com/detail.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.planningpoker.com/detail.html</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Butler</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/07/01/agile-software-development-the-principles-principle-7-working-software-is-the-primary-measure-of-progress/#comment-5373</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3283#comment-5373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Robbrecht,

Interesting post.

In the presented graphs, what are the units of work and how do you know when these are complete?

Regards,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robbrecht,</p>
<p>Interesting post.</p>
<p>In the presented graphs, what are the units of work and how do you know when these are complete?</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
