<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JavaOne 2008 &#8211; The upcoming JavaServer Faces 2.0 specification &#8211; time to harvest!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/2008/05/09/javaone-2008-the-upcoming-javaserver-faces-20-specification-time-to-harvest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/05/09/javaone-2008-the-upcoming-javaserver-faces-20-specification-time-to-harvest/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=javaone-2008-the-upcoming-javaserver-faces-20-specification-time-to-harvest</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grÃ¼ner tee</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/05/09/javaone-2008-the-upcoming-javaserver-faces-20-specification-time-to-harvest/#comment-5327</link>
		<dc:creator>grÃ¼ner tee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3154#comment-5327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the contributions of the expert group, the JavaServer Faces APIs are being designed so that they can be leveraged by tools that will make web application development even easier. Several respected tools vendors were members of the JSR-314 expert group, which developed the JavaServer Faces 2.0 specification]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the contributions of the expert group, the JavaServer Faces APIs are being designed so that they can be leveraged by tools that will make web application development even easier. Several respected tools vendors were members of the JSR-314 expert group, which developed the JavaServer Faces 2.0 specification</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Muir</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/05/09/javaone-2008-the-upcoming-javaserver-faces-20-specification-time-to-harvest/#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 01:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3154#comment-5326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Lucas, thanks for this post, I&#039;ve been looking for a good JSF2.0 write up for sometime.

Given Oracle&#039;s adoption of JSF, and in a number of cases technology solutions over and above the current JSF specs, do you believe the next JSF spec will require Oracle to rework significant parts of their solutions to remain standard compliant?  For example you mention the adoption of the partial page update by JSF 2.0, something which Oracle has had in their own (proprietary) solutions since UIX.  In other words, and my larger concern, will we see another large rework of Oracle&#039;s component set in a future release?

Cheers,

CM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lucas, thanks for this post, I&#8217;ve been looking for a good JSF2.0 write up for sometime.</p>
<p>Given Oracle&#8217;s adoption of JSF, and in a number of cases technology solutions over and above the current JSF specs, do you believe the next JSF spec will require Oracle to rework significant parts of their solutions to remain standard compliant?  For example you mention the adoption of the partial page update by JSF 2.0, something which Oracle has had in their own (proprietary) solutions since UIX.  In other words, and my larger concern, will we see another large rework of Oracle&#8217;s component set in a future release?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>CM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
