<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fear for renaming (refactoring) ADF BC objects in JDeveloper 10.1.3.3 is not unfounded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/2008/02/15/fear-for-renaming-refactoring-adf-bc-objects-in-jdeveloper-is-not-unfounded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/02/15/fear-for-renaming-refactoring-adf-bc-objects-in-jdeveloper-is-not-unfounded/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fear-for-renaming-refactoring-adf-bc-objects-in-jdeveloper-is-not-unfounded</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Houweling</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/02/15/fear-for-renaming-refactoring-adf-bc-objects-in-jdeveloper-is-not-unfounded/#comment-5194</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Houweling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=2859#comment-5194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucas, John: I have added:
-Renaming an item and a region in a JHeadstart Application Definition.
-Remarks about consequences for the AFD model layer, particularly that pageDefinition en JSPX files are not updated when you rename a VO instance or VO attribute, which is correct (but maybe not expected) because the BC and model are separated layers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucas, John: I have added:<br />
-Renaming an item and a region in a JHeadstart Application Definition.<br />
-Remarks about consequences for the AFD model layer, particularly that pageDefinition en JSPX files are not updated when you rename a VO instance or VO attribute, which is correct (but maybe not expected) because the BC and model are separated layers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas Jellema</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/02/15/fear-for-renaming-refactoring-adf-bc-objects-in-jdeveloper-is-not-unfounded/#comment-5193</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Jellema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=2859#comment-5193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very useful overview Frank.Well done. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have you per chance also looked at renaming an Item (and a Region) in a JHeadstart Application Definition? What is your recommendation for removing the obsolete entries from the DataBindings.cpx file or the Resource Bundles? Are these straightforward but manual actions? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Steve Muench writes that in JDeveloper 11g (from TP3 onwards) refactoring for ADF BC is enabled: &lt;a href=&quot;http://radio.weblogs.com/0118231/2008/01/08.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Refactoring ADF BC&lt;/a&gt;.
Lucas]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful overview Frank.Well done. </p>
<p>Have you per chance also looked at renaming an Item (and a Region) in a JHeadstart Application Definition? What is your recommendation for removing the obsolete entries from the DataBindings.cpx file or the Resource Bundles? Are these straightforward but manual actions? </p>
<p>Steve Muench writes that in JDeveloper 11g (from TP3 onwards) refactoring for ADF BC is enabled: <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0118231/2008/01/08.html" rel="nofollow">Refactoring ADF BC</a>.<br />
Lucas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Vervecken</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/02/15/fear-for-renaming-refactoring-adf-bc-objects-in-jdeveloper-is-not-unfounded/#comment-5192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Vervecken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=2859#comment-5192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi
This forum thread is somewhat related, &quot;ADF BC : change Entity attribute type to DBSequence&quot;:
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=602081
regards
Jan Vervecken]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
This forum thread is somewhat related, &#8220;ADF BC : change Entity attribute type to DBSequence&#8221;:<br />
<a href="http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=602081" rel="nofollow">http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=602081</a><br />
regards<br />
Jan Vervecken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Muir</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/02/15/fear-for-renaming-refactoring-adf-bc-objects-in-jdeveloper-is-not-unfounded/#comment-5191</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Muir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=2859#comment-5191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post Frank.

CM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Frank.</p>
<p>CM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stegeman</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2008/02/15/fear-for-renaming-refactoring-adf-bc-objects-in-jdeveloper-is-not-unfounded/#comment-5190</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stegeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=2859#comment-5190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frank,

Well done! I believe there are also probably some pageDef.xml issues when re-factoring straight BC objects (without JHeadstart), particularly if a VO or AM is renamed.

But well, done, sir, well done

John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>Well done! I believe there are also probably some pageDef.xml issues when re-factoring straight BC objects (without JHeadstart), particularly if a VO or AM is renamed.</p>
<p>But well, done, sir, well done</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
