Comments on: Using the javax.xml.bind annotations to convert Java objects to XML and XSD http://technology.amis.nl/2007/05/30/using-the-javaxxmlbind-annotations-to-convert-java-objects-to-xml-and-xsd/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=using-the-javaxxmlbind-annotations-to-convert-java-objects-to-xml-and-xsd Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Dileep Kumar http://technology.amis.nl/2007/05/30/using-the-javaxxmlbind-annotations-to-convert-java-objects-to-xml-and-xsd/#comment-4642 Dileep Kumar Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:31:38 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=2046#comment-4642 Really good one

]]> By: The Mole http://technology.amis.nl/2007/05/30/using-the-javaxxmlbind-annotations-to-convert-java-objects-to-xml-and-xsd/#comment-4641 The Mole Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:44:47 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=2046#comment-4641 Thanks for this, just what I was looking for to generate a schema from my model.

The advantage of SchemaOutputResolver being a class rather than an interface is if they want to add another method to it.  If it is an interface adding a method breaks all existing code and stops it from compiling.  As a class this isn’t necessarily the case if they SchemaOutputResolve could provide a default implementation of the method and subclassers would keep working fine.

]]> By: Straun http://technology.amis.nl/2007/05/30/using-the-javaxxmlbind-annotations-to-convert-java-objects-to-xml-and-xsd/#comment-4640 Straun Thu, 31 May 2007 02:58:25 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=2046#comment-4640 XStream works better; more types out of the box, fewer bugs

]]> By: p3t0r http://technology.amis.nl/2007/05/30/using-the-javaxxmlbind-annotations-to-convert-java-objects-to-xml-and-xsd/#comment-4639 p3t0r Wed, 30 May 2007 12:28:13 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=2046#comment-4639 Cool stuff!

]]>