Comments on: Performance Problems in RAC cluster 9.2.0.7 http://technology.amis.nl/2006/12/12/performance-problems-in-rac-cluster-9207/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=performance-problems-in-rac-cluster-9207 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:09:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Karl http://technology.amis.nl/2006/12/12/performance-problems-in-rac-cluster-9207/#comment-4124 Karl Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:03:35 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1430#comment-4124 thanks Gerwin for sharing this experience to the online community;
Karl

]]> By: gerwin_h http://technology.amis.nl/2006/12/12/performance-problems-in-rac-cluster-9207/#comment-4123 gerwin_h Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:58:51 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1430#comment-4123 The note 343180.1 is an ALERT note from Oracle. The patch 4947798 you mention is a patch also including two other severe issues, so patch 4658188 is part of patch 4947798. The other fixed bugs are:

- Bug 4771380 – 9207 Upgrd Rac Db – 3 Instances All Crash Ora-4031, Core Dumps
- Bug 4923667 – Ora-27300, Ora-27301, Ora-27302 Err after apply patch 4778081

Regards, Gerwin Hendriksen

]]> By: Jacco Landlust http://technology.amis.nl/2006/12/12/performance-problems-in-rac-cluster-9207/#comment-4122 Jacco Landlust Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:28:18 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1430#comment-4122 I ran into this bug lately on tru64 when using a TCP interconnect (not memorychannel) and guess what: the patch you mention is not availlable for tru64. Therefore I was pointed to patch 4947798 (via note 343180.1).

I am still wondering wat is the main difference though (yes it is on my shortlist for follow-ups, but so far other issues have more priority)

]]>