Comments on: Using unique function based index as check constraint http://technology.amis.nl/2006/07/14/using-unique-function-based-index-as-check-constraint/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=using-unique-function-based-index-as-check-constraint Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Piyush http://technology.amis.nl/2006/07/14/using-unique-function-based-index-as-check-constraint/#comment-3603 Piyush Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:12:50 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1281#comment-3603 please find the solution at -
http://plsqlnotes.blogspot.com/search/label/Function%20Based%20Index

]]> By: Serguey Kavafian http://technology.amis.nl/2006/07/14/using-unique-function-based-index-as-check-constraint/#comment-3602 Serguey Kavafian Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:32:05 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1281#comment-3602 Thank you for the “Using unique function based index as check constraint”. It helps a bit but there are still not possible to create more complex constrains.

]]> By: Robert Willems http://technology.amis.nl/2006/07/14/using-unique-function-based-index-as-check-constraint/#comment-3601 Robert Willems Fri, 14 Jul 2006 11:00:31 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1281#comment-3601 Hi Jurgen,

thanks for the pointer. I was doing it the different way around. Creating a materialized view that contained the function as a column and creating a unique key on that materialized view. Talk about the long way around ;-) , this will make it a lot ‘smoother’.

Regards,
Robert

]]>