<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Cluster Server anomaly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/2006/07/05/microsoft-cluster-server-anomaly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/07/05/microsoft-cluster-server-anomaly/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=microsoft-cluster-server-anomaly</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacco Landlust</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/07/05/microsoft-cluster-server-anomaly/#comment-3552</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacco Landlust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 14:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1271#comment-3552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me this is expected behaviour. The first node of the cluster is started and checks if he can manage the assigned quorum disk. In fact it can, since no other node contacted the quorum disk. So there you have cluster number 1. The second node tries to do the exact same thing, but instead of contacting the same quorum disk, it contacts a new quorum disk. So the second node also &quot;thinks&quot; that the other node is down and start running a cluster.

In the disk manager you could (and should) have checked if the disks were mapped to the same lun. Seems that clustering on Windows is made a bit too easy ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me this is expected behaviour. The first node of the cluster is started and checks if he can manage the assigned quorum disk. In fact it can, since no other node contacted the quorum disk. So there you have cluster number 1. The second node tries to do the exact same thing, but instead of contacting the same quorum disk, it contacts a new quorum disk. So the second node also &#8220;thinks&#8221; that the other node is down and start running a cluster.</p>
<p>In the disk manager you could (and should) have checked if the disks were mapped to the same lun. Seems that clustering on Windows is made a bit too easy <img src='http://technology.amis.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Gralike</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/07/05/microsoft-cluster-server-anomaly/#comment-3551</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Gralike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 11:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1271#comment-3551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post <img src='http://technology.amis.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
