<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting used to Oracle SQL Developer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3178</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I click on &quot;Actions&quot; beside the filter, there is not option for exporting, is this something we have to enable?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I click on &#8220;Actions&#8221; beside the filter, there is not option for exporting, is this something we have to enable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Sinke</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3177</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sinke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 08:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Gary, thanks for your reply. I suspected already that JDeveloper and SQL Developer shared the same code. The GUI and LAF are too similar to be a coincendence also.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gary, thanks for your reply. I suspected already that JDeveloper and SQL Developer shared the same code. The GUI and LAF are too similar to be a coincendence also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Belleville</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3176</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Belleville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 19:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick,

You were asking about having the same firewall issue as with JDeveloper.  There is a good reason for that: my understanding is that Oracle stripped code right out of JDeveloper to create SQL Developer!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,</p>
<p>You were asking about having the same firewall issue as with JDeveloper.  There is a good reason for that: my understanding is that Oracle stripped code right out of JDeveloper to create SQL Developer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Sinke</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3175</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sinke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 08:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harm, this blogpost is not about demonstrating how good SQL Developer is. I am not trying to convince people to switch from TOAD or any other tool to SQL Developer. This tool is however an option for some people, and it does have potential in my opinion. So please do not disqualify it because it does not suit your needs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harm, this blogpost is not about demonstrating how good SQL Developer is. I am not trying to convince people to switch from TOAD or any other tool to SQL Developer. This tool is however an option for some people, and it does have potential in my opinion. So please do not disqualify it because it does not suit your needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harm Verschuren</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator>Harm Verschuren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 09:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting used...to not seeing your data properly?
SQL Developer is *bagger* from the upper shelf. It does a very poor job when working with xmltype data types and functions or working with AQ, to name a few. Even iSQLPlus does a better job at these points. At least in iSQLPlus (and the good old SQLPlus) shows the XML when queriing an xmltype column, in SQL Developer it shows (XMLTYPE).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting used&#8230;to not seeing your data properly?<br />
SQL Developer is *bagger* from the upper shelf. It does a very poor job when working with xmltype data types and functions or working with AQ, to name a few. Even iSQLPlus does a better job at these points. At least in iSQLPlus (and the good old SQLPlus) shows the XML when queriing an xmltype column, in SQL Developer it shows (XMLTYPE).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Sinke</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sinke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 09:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I checked various combinations of portranges: 79-80, 80-80, 80-81, 79-81. In all cases it avoids port 80, and if 80 is the only choice it uses &quot;0&quot;. I&#039;m not sure if this is done deliberately (security?) or if ithe protocol itself is not suitable to use port 80 for debugging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked various combinations of portranges: 79-80, 80-80, 80-81, 79-81. In all cases it avoids port 80, and if 80 is the only choice it uses &#8220;0&#8243;. I&#8217;m not sure if this is done deliberately (security?) or if ithe protocol itself is not suitable to use port 80 for debugging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rekounas</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3172</link>
		<dc:creator>rekounas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny, I just sent out a mass e-mail to our Java developers and DBAs at work today to use this as an alternative to TOAD.  I noticed most of the developers were pretty green about database technologies, so SQL Developer would be more than what they need.

The DBAs thought it was cool cause they all hate TOAD.  They prefer DBartisain, and for DBA work I would have to say that is the tool to go with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I just sent out a mass e-mail to our Java developers and DBAs at work today to use this as an alternative to TOAD.  I noticed most of the developers were pretty green about database technologies, so SQL Developer would be more than what they need.</p>
<p>The DBAs thought it was cool cause they all hate TOAD.  They prefer DBartisain, and for DBA work I would have to say that is the tool to go with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thet</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3171</link>
		<dc:creator>Thet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick:

Have you tried using port 79-80? It might us 80 if it tends to choose the higher port #. Let us know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick:</p>
<p>Have you tried using port 79-80? It might us 80 if it tends to choose the higher port #. Let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Sinke</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3170</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sinke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is true, you can also select themes like Desert Green and Sky Red!

By the way, I tried to force the debugger to communicate on port 80 in order to circumvene the FW bug. This is not possible though. When I select range 80 through 80 it uses port &quot;0&quot; (and throws an error!) and with the range 80 through 81 is uses port 81. Too bad, but it was worth a try.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, you can also select themes like Desert Green and Sky Red!</p>
<p>By the way, I tried to force the debugger to communicate on port 80 in order to circumvene the FW bug. This is not possible though. When I select range 80 through 80 it uses port &#8220;0&#8243; (and throws an error!) and with the range 80 through 81 is uses port 81. Too bad, but it was worth a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2006/04/28/getting-used-to-oracle-sql-developer/#comment-3169</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1171#comment-3169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool ;o)
Even if you stay with the Oracle LAF, you can swap between a lot of themes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool ;o)<br />
Even if you stay with the Oracle LAF, you can swap between a lot of themes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
