Comments on: EJB 3.0 Persistence – using the @Version annotation for Optimistic Locking – in the GlassFish Reference Implementation http://technology.amis.nl/2006/01/03/ejb-30-persistence-using-the-version-annotation-for-optimistic-locking-in-the-glassfish-reference-implementation/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ejb-30-persistence-using-the-version-annotation-for-optimistic-locking-in-the-glassfish-reference-implementation Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Gordon Yorke http://technology.amis.nl/2006/01/03/ejb-30-persistence-using-the-version-annotation-for-optimistic-locking-in-the-glassfish-reference-implementation/#comment-2756 Gordon Yorke Tue, 09 May 2006 17:35:39 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=977#comment-2756 Timestamp not working for @Version annotation is a bug. (https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=647)

This one slipped through but in the future, reporting such issues as they are found, through the Glassfish project, will help to have these sort of issues resolved in a timely manner. Glad people are trying it out.
–Gordon

]]> By: Rod Macpherson http://technology.amis.nl/2006/01/03/ejb-30-persistence-using-the-version-annotation-for-optimistic-locking-in-the-glassfish-reference-implementation/#comment-2755 Rod Macpherson Fri, 24 Feb 2006 02:34:16 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=977#comment-2755 As you were: spec claims @Version can be numeric or Timestamp.

]]> By: Rod Macpherson http://technology.amis.nl/2006/01/03/ejb-30-persistence-using-the-version-annotation-for-optimistic-locking-in-the-glassfish-reference-implementation/#comment-2754 Rod Macpherson Fri, 24 Feb 2006 02:30:18 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=977#comment-2754 They have an @Timestamp annotation for optimistic locking. Specification states that
@Version has to be numeric.

]]> By: Lucas Jellema http://technology.amis.nl/2006/01/03/ejb-30-persistence-using-the-version-annotation-for-optimistic-locking-in-the-glassfish-reference-implementation/#comment-2753 Lucas Jellema Tue, 03 Jan 2006 19:43:48 +0000 http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=977#comment-2753 Edited the article, looked into using a Timestamp type attribute with @Version. Does not work it seems.

]]>