<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: new JHeadstart Team blog Announces production release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/2005/02/19/new-jheadstart-team-blog-announces-production-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2005/02/19/new-jheadstart-team-blog-announces-production-release/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-jheadstart-team-blog-announces-production-release</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon van Tegelen</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2005/02/19/new-jheadstart-team-blog-announces-production-release/#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon van Tegelen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 22:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=418#comment-1799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes indeed that is what I meant. We are now at 95% procent of the specs. The application is generated for about 95% procent now. The rest are post generation changes. The amount of coding is still very minimal en mostly concerns businessrules. To be totally fair I must say the application we are building is very well suited for JHeadStart, being an OLTP application with multirecord, master-detail forms.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes indeed that is what I meant. We are now at 95% procent of the specs. The application is generated for about 95% procent now. The rest are post generation changes. The amount of coding is still very minimal en mostly concerns businessrules. To be totally fair I must say the application we are building is very well suited for JHeadStart, being an OLTP application with multirecord, master-detail forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob williams</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2005/02/19/new-jheadstart-team-blog-announces-production-release/#comment-1798</link>
		<dc:creator>rob williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=418#comment-1798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pardon the question to your weblog, but we are looking at JHeadstart, and your blog was mentioned (by Oracle rep) as an Oracle customer that had a production level application built using JHeadstart.  Could you provide a little more clarification on &quot;... meets the specs for about 80 â€“ 90%...&quot;?  Does this mean that you have the application up and running, but still have 20% (or less) to hammer out, before it is completely functioning as designed?

Thank you,

Robert Williams]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon the question to your weblog, but we are looking at JHeadstart, and your blog was mentioned (by Oracle rep) as an Oracle customer that had a production level application built using JHeadstart.  Could you provide a little more clarification on &#8220;&#8230; meets the specs for about 80 â€“ 90%&#8230;&#8221;?  Does this mean that you have the application up and running, but still have 20% (or less) to hammer out, before it is completely functioning as designed?</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Robert Williams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
