Comments on: XSLT is Way Faster Using Java 5 http://technology.amis.nl/2005/02/07/xslt-is-way-faster-using-java-5/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=xslt-is-way-faster-using-java-5 Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Henrik StÃ¥hl http://technology.amis.nl/2005/02/07/xslt-is-way-faster-using-java-5/#comment-1666 Henrik StÃ¥hl Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:59:40 +0000 /?p=387#comment-1666 For a fair comparison, you should run Hotspot 5.0 vs JRockit 5.0. Sun has improved a bit since their 1.4.2 version, although they are still behind us. And yes, JRockit is so far available only on Windows and Linux on Intel (IA32, EM64T/AMD64, Itanium). But keep watching the news…

Henrik, JRockit Team

]]> By: Frank Nestel http://technology.amis.nl/2005/02/07/xslt-is-way-faster-using-java-5/#comment-1665 Frank Nestel Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:10:49 +0000 /?p=387#comment-1665 This is only true for people who did not care choosing their parsers and xslt-Processors themselves (which is made so easy by the java plugable provider mechanism). We’ve been using Piccolo for parsing most of the time (well I know two bugs, I knew more in Xerces before I stopped using it) and Saxon or JDxslt for Transformation. All those were free for years and so much faster than the crap they built into the JDK. Guess they are now equally fast or so.

]]> By: Jasper http://technology.amis.nl/2005/02/07/xslt-is-way-faster-using-java-5/#comment-1664 Jasper Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:02:04 +0000 /?p=387#comment-1664 Ah, that’s good to know! thanx

]]> By: Olaf Heimburger http://technology.amis.nl/2005/02/07/xslt-is-way-faster-using-java-5/#comment-1663 Olaf Heimburger Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:51:14 +0000 /?p=387#comment-1663 JRockit is only faster on Intel platforms. On other it will miserably fail. (Not available for :-)

]]>