<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working with Omondo&#039;s EclipseUML Free Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m using the current (2007) Free EclipseUML version for Eclipse 3.2 (i.e. not the Europa edition) with mixed results (experimenting with class diagrams only).  Reverse engineering from Java source doesn&#039;t seem to render associations, neither for single member variables (one-to-one) nor arrays or containers (one-tro-many).  Informaton relating to this on the Omondo site and forums is confusing and contradictory as to whether this feature is enabled in the free version or not.  (The author on this page seems to have successfully rendered associatins, but then he was using a 2004 version.)

Forward engineering of associations works, but member variables are inserted at the bottom of existing code, below existing methods.  This is unorthodox and bad style in my books, which makes this feature rather useless.

When enabling Dependencies, reverse engineering ends up producing total spaghetti with multiple dependency arrows between classes, apparently one per function call, local and parameter variable etc.  There seems to be no way of taming this behaviour or filtering, not even selecting all or multiple dependencies at once.  All I can do is selecting one dependency at a time and hiding it, unacceptable for a real scenario.  Disabling dependency wiring in the options doesn&#039;t appear to do anything to existing diagrams, so I wonder why this option is there.

What am I doing wrong?  As long as these features are not there, and/or not easy to figure out, this packge is too rough to use for me and my students.  Any attempt to prove me wrong is appreciated. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using the current (2007) Free EclipseUML version for Eclipse 3.2 (i.e. not the Europa edition) with mixed results (experimenting with class diagrams only).  Reverse engineering from Java source doesn&#8217;t seem to render associations, neither for single member variables (one-to-one) nor arrays or containers (one-tro-many).  Informaton relating to this on the Omondo site and forums is confusing and contradictory as to whether this feature is enabled in the free version or not.  (The author on this page seems to have successfully rendered associatins, but then he was using a 2004 version.)</p>
<p>Forward engineering of associations works, but member variables are inserted at the bottom of existing code, below existing methods.  This is unorthodox and bad style in my books, which makes this feature rather useless.</p>
<p>When enabling Dependencies, reverse engineering ends up producing total spaghetti with multiple dependency arrows between classes, apparently one per function call, local and parameter variable etc.  There seems to be no way of taming this behaviour or filtering, not even selecting all or multiple dependencies at once.  All I can do is selecting one dependency at a time and hiding it, unacceptable for a real scenario.  Disabling dependency wiring in the options doesn&#8217;t appear to do anything to existing diagrams, so I wonder why this option is there.</p>
<p>What am I doing wrong?  As long as these features are not there, and/or not easy to figure out, this packge is too rough to use for me and my students.  Any attempt to prove me wrong is appreciated. <img src='http://technology.amis.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gisela</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Gisela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 01:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, I have to use aspects over the EclipseUML plugin... could you help me to know where to start? Which method is invoked when you create a diagram??
Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I have to use aspects over the EclipseUML plugin&#8230; could you help me to know where to start? Which method is invoked when you create a diagram??<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sivatheja</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Sivatheja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right click on &#039;package explorer&#039; to get &#039;reverse engineer&#039; option.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right click on &#8216;package explorer&#8217; to get &#8216;reverse engineer&#8217; option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The importing of XMI is only supported in the Studio version, which sucks as EclipseUML doesn&#039;t support OCL and other tastie titbits you can find in argiouml.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The importing of XMI is only supported in the Studio version, which sucks as EclipseUML doesn&#8217;t support OCL and other tastie titbits you can find in argiouml.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am having the same problem as Stephen above. when i right click on my project in Eclipse, there is no &quot;reverse engineering&quot; option. any help is appreciated!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having the same problem as Stephen above. when i right click on my project in Eclipse, there is no &#8220;reverse engineering&#8221; option. any help is appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikael</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This tutorial was really helpful! Thanx!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tutorial was really helpful! Thanx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,

I think you have to start eclipse with the -clean option.

Brgds]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I think you have to start eclipse with the -clean option.</p>
<p>Brgds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Barrett</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 05:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like a worthwhile tool, if I can get Eclipse to recognize it. When I enter:
   java -jar eclipseUML_E301_freeEdition_2.0.0.beta.20041026.jar
All the listed files end up in the proper directories (features and plugins), but Eclipse fails to see them. What am I missing?

Thanks a head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a worthwhile tool, if I can get Eclipse to recognize it. When I enter:<br />
   java -jar eclipseUML_E301_freeEdition_2.0.0.beta.20041026.jar<br />
All the listed files end up in the proper directories (features and plugins), but Eclipse fails to see them. What am I missing?</p>
<p>Thanks a head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepak</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Download eclipseUML_E301 _freeEdition_2.0.0.beta. 20041026.jar (free edition for Eclipse 3.0,  although I tried it for Elcipse 3.1).&lt;/i&gt;

eclipseUML_E301_freeEdition_2.0.0.beta.20041026.jar is not availbale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Download eclipseUML_E301 _freeEdition_2.0.0.beta. 20041026.jar (free edition for Eclipse 3.0,  although I tried it for Elcipse 3.1).</i></p>
<p>eclipseUML_E301_freeEdition_2.0.0.beta.20041026.jar is not availbale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeger Hendrikse</title>
		<link>http://technology.amis.nl/2004/11/04/working-with-omondos-eclipseuml-free-edition/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeger Hendrikse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=243#comment-1054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your positive feedback!

I coulndn&#039;t agree with you more: it took me quite some time to get acquainted with Omondo&#039;s UML package, mainly due to their tutorial being insufficiently clear. It is a pity that they didn&#039;t improve on it, since it somewhat &quot;hides&quot; the nice product they offer!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your positive feedback!</p>
<p>I coulndn&#8217;t agree with you more: it took me quite some time to get acquainted with Omondo&#8217;s UML package, mainly due to their tutorial being insufficiently clear. It is a pity that they didn&#8217;t improve on it, since it somewhat &#8220;hides&#8221; the nice product they offer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
