Comments on: Comparison Oracle, PostgreSQL and MySQL http://technology.amis.nl/2004/07/02/comparison-oracle-postgresql-and-mysql/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=comparison-oracle-postgresql-and-mysql Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Auto Parts Locator http://technology.amis.nl/2004/07/02/comparison-oracle-postgresql-and-mysql/#comment-186 Auto Parts Locator Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:26:50 +0000 /?p=23#comment-186 Auto Parts Locator

Is that a template? If not your a great designer!

]]> By: Lucas http://technology.amis.nl/2004/07/02/comparison-oracle-postgresql-and-mysql/#comment-185 Lucas Mon, 04 Oct 2004 09:21:40 +0000 /?p=23#comment-185 The link in your post is not correct (anymore): 404 (of course the server could be down but I am not sure how permanent that might be)

]]> By: Zeger Hendrikse http://technology.amis.nl/2004/07/02/comparison-oracle-postgresql-and-mysql/#comment-184 Zeger Hendrikse Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:26:48 +0000 /?p=23#comment-184 My impression is (from both links) that PostgreSQL is the better database, in particular because of the ACID compliance. Apparently from version 7.1 the stability of PostgreSQL has improved to such an extent, that this should not favour MySQL as much anymore as it did. Of course, the much larger user base of MySQL and its security capabilities remain a strong pre.

]]> By: Lucas Jellema http://technology.amis.nl/2004/07/02/comparison-oracle-postgresql-and-mysql/#comment-183 Lucas Jellema Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:54:33 +0000 /?p=23#comment-183 Interesting comparison is also found at http://www.geocities.com/mailsoftware42/db/

]]>