Comments on: Database access with Ant! http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=database-access-with-ant Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:04:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: budowa domów http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-170 budowa domów Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:10:09 +0000 /?p=17#comment-170 Good article and site. Congratulations

]]> By: Bad Credit Credit Cards http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-169 Bad Credit Credit Cards Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:09:34 +0000 /?p=17#comment-169 Bad Credit Credit Cards

Wow this is a really nice blog

]]> By: Puma Shoes http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-168 Puma Shoes Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:59:31 +0000 /?p=17#comment-168 Puma Shoes

Are you sure of that?

]]> By: Ties http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-167 Ties Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:47:31 +0000 /?p=17#comment-167 Ties

Excellent idea. I will try it.

]]> By: Bad Credit Credit Cards http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-166 Bad Credit Credit Cards Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:47:17 +0000 /?p=17#comment-166 Bad Credit Credit Cards

I dont believe it. Where is the proof?

]]> By: Magazine http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-165 Magazine Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:17:14 +0000 /?p=17#comment-165 Magazine

That is really cool …if it is true.

]]> By: Bowling Shoes http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-164 Bowling Shoes Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:38:40 +0000 /?p=17#comment-164 Bowling Shoes

Hi. I think you have a really nice blog.

]]> By: Wireless Camera Shop http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-163 Wireless Camera Shop Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:21:18 +0000 /?p=17#comment-163 Wireless Camera Shop

I think you have a really nice site.

]]> By: Lucas http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-162 Lucas Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:19:53 +0000 /?p=17#comment-162 No, the syntax of the function definition is correct like this: function function_name (parameters) return <type> is …

]]> By: Coca IQ Bogdan http://technology.amis.nl/2004/06/30/database-access-with-ant/#comment-161 Coca IQ Bogdan Wed, 01 Dec 2004 21:39:19 +0000 /?p=17#comment-161 Sorry musn’t :
Function rdc_date_get_jou(
p_datin IN DATE
)
Return VARCHAR2;

to be
Function rdc_date_get_jou(
p_datin IN DATE
Return VARCHAR2;

)

???? I mean the Return VARCHAR2;
shouldn’t be inserted into the function?

]]>